Give residents more practice with the deteriorating inpatient.
A patient becomes hypoxic. A blood pressure falls. A rhythm changes. Rapid Response Sim gives learners a place to practice what to ask, what to do first, when to reassess and when to call for help — with case-specific teaching and feedback.
Physician-led case design · Individual practice in a browser · Feedback for the next teaching session
Practice the whole first-response sequence.
Assess and prioritize
The case begins with a deteriorating inpatient. Ask for bedside findings and studies, interpret the information available, and decide what matters first.
Treat and reassess
Choose initial management, request help and follow the patient's course. Practice recognition, stabilization and escalation within your clinical role.
Reflect and repeat
Review the diagnosis, case teaching and feedback on your decisions after the case. Use the next session to revisit a learning need.
Give learners a practice activity between clinical shifts and facilitated simulation sessions. An AI-mediated environment builds on physician-led case design, with case teaching and feedback to support reflection.
Clinical review is ongoing; confirm the available content for your cohort. AI responses can require correction. See the learner experience and educational scope →
A practice routine faculty can follow.
Use one cohort and a defined educational need: intern preparation, night-float teaching or ongoing acute-care practice. Agree when learners will practice and how faculty will use the findings.
Repeatable case practice
Work through hypoxia, shock, arrhythmias, sepsis and altered mental status in a browser. Learners can practice individually between scheduled teaching sessions.
Participation you can see
Follow case starts, completions and recency by learner. Export participation for your educational review and identify where onboarding or engagement needs attention.
Information for teaching
Review pooled skill and condition results where reporting thresholds are met. Use those patterns in faculty discussion; they are formative learning information, not certification of competence.
See the program reporting walkthrough → Synthetic demonstration data.
Named score sharing is optional and revocable. Pooled results require sufficient data; a small cohort may not have a published performance breakdown.
What does the research support?
Virtual-patient research supports educational use, with benefits in some assessed skills and mixed results across settings.*
A review of 51 randomized virtual-patient trials found benefits in assessed skills, with variable results and generally low-quality evidence. More recent AI-patient studies provide narrower history-taking evidence.
Read six selected studies, findings and limitations →* These studies evaluated other systems; SigVy's effect on independent clinical skills or patient outcomes has not yet been established.
Our current resident pilots are helping evaluate use, feedback and curriculum fit. We can help you define what a useful local evaluation would look like.
Size a plan around your curriculum.
- 4 cases, once — not a monthly refill
- Core rapid-response scenarios
- A full debrief after every case
- 15 cases included every month
- Need more? Additional cases $4 each
- Choose your theme and difficulty
- The full scenario library, with ECG and chest X-ray cases
- Progress tracking and case history
- Full scenario-library access with a shared program case allowance
- Per-learner participation reporting, exportable
- Pooled learning results to guide faculty teaching
- Program-selected cases from the reviewed library
- More than one program administrator
Program bands
Priced on enrolled seats, billed annually. Each band includes cases shared across the program. If your planned practice needs more, add cases at signup or renewal for $4.00 each — mid-term additions are $5.50 each. Use the calculator below to size your plan.
| Band | Seats | Per year | Cases included | Add at signup/renewal | Add mid-term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small group | Up to 15 | $1,800 | 350 | $4.00 each | $5.50 each |
| Small team | Up to 30 | $3,000 | 600 | $4.00 each | $5.50 each |
| Small program | Up to 50 | $4,500 | 900 | $4.00 each | $5.50 each |
| Mid program | Up to 150 | $9,000 | 1,800 | $4.00 each | $5.50 each |
| Large program | Up to 300 | $15,000 | 3,000 | $4.00 each | $5.50 each |
| Health system | 300+ | Custom | Custom | — | — |
Plan your program's case allowance
See whether your planned practice fits the included shared cases.
Recommended: Small team + 300 add-on cases committed at signup — $4,200.00 per year.
900 planned cases, including the selected cushion.
Small team: 600 shared cases included.
Additional capacity committed at signup or renewal: 300 cases · $1,200.00 ($4.00 each).
Estimated annual total: $4,200.00 — you save $450.00 versus adding the same 300 cases mid-term at $5.50 each.
Annual contract pricing. Cases are shared across the program. Case starts, including retries and abandoned attempts, count toward use, so completion goals may need a cushion. If your program sets a required cadence — say, three cases per clinician per month — your annual need is predictable, and committing it at signup or renewal gets the lower per-case rate. Additions expire at renewal; unused additions do not roll over.
Request a program quoteEvaluate it with one cohort: a 6-month pilot with up to 50 seats and 450 included cases is $2,250, with the pilot fee credited toward an annual conversion under your written agreement. Confirm conversion dates and case allowances in the proposal. Ask about a pilot.
For educational practice. No CME credit is currently offered. Confirm the reviewed content, access and contract terms for your cohort.
Useful information. Ready to share.
Explore the program guide
The learner experience, curriculum example, reporting, research and answers to buyer questions.
Read online →Take the client packet
A fuller PDF for your faculty sponsor or budget owner, including program options and a purchase rationale.
Download the information packet →Send a short overview
A two-page introduction for the first conversation, with the educational use and an illustrative budget.
Download the two-page brief →Questions program directors ask
Where does it fit?
Intern preparation, night-float teaching and longitudinal inpatient curricula. Start with a faculty owner and a realistic practice schedule, then review actual participation.
What can faculty see?
Named participation and pooled learning results where sufficient data are available. A learner can opt into sharing an aggregate personal score; participation CSVs exclude scores.
How do we get started?
Discuss your cohort, practice frequency and purchasing process. We will demonstrate the workflow, prepare a scoped proposal and confirm network access and onboarding needs.